Over the years the test for proper comprehension of an analysis is an exam. This is the case in this area of the world. At the end of the day the individual who comes up with the best grade is declared the overall best without considering differences in the number of students who wrote exam and the mode applied to such exam.

Imagine an exam written by 10 students whose learning curves differ- under the same condition. Really? Identifying the most excellent cannot be difficult.

Flip the coin- put students with same learning curves in a class, it can be called any name just for identification, then attach a dynamic teacher who can make the best out of them. If at the end of the day you cannot possibly teach all, that’s fine! Set a test based on what was taught. Check the result…

Achieving good grades in this second instance won’t be hectic at all, since they were taught with full consideration of their learning curves.

The fact here is that no child is a dullard- even with trait of disability- if understood, given time and taught with a result-oriented approach such student would acquire same result as the best in the mixed class.

Enforcing a curriculum on the child regardless of the pace of learning or learning curve cannot give the best from such as compared to fitting the curriculum to the child which is achievable once the child is properly understood before the process of learning begins.  

Every child can do exceptionally well if time is taken to understand such with lesson designed to suit the curve deciphered.